Praja Rajyam Party chief Chiranjeevi seems to have mastered the art of political rhetoric – making statements which have no head or tail, yet trying to tell people that there is total clarity in the statements.
On Monday, Chiranjeevi said he had total clarity on the Telangana issue and his statement from the Treaty public meeting dais spoke it all. What does he mean by total clarity? He only said Telangana was an issue of self-respect for the people of the region. A few days later, he said Telangana sentiment was because of lack of development. On Sunday, he took a U turn and said sentiment could not be overcome by development.
So, what does Chiru want to say? Is he for separate Telangana or for development of Telangana? Please give us some clarity. Then, people will decide about your fate.
HALF KNOWLEDGE IS ALMOST DANGER AND WILL HAVE NO VALIDITY
To criticise any thing without knowing the procs and cons is becoming a passion to every body. of course as you said Chiru had no Clarity on Telangana. I would like to draw your attention Is there any political party in A.P. which had a clarity on Telangana issue and its origin. Have you ever even turned the pages of Andhra History with special reference to Telangana?. Had the commentator ever read the essence of the writing ” VISALANDRALO PRAJARAJYAM’ by the veteran and selfless leader Puchalapalli?. Had the commentator ever seen in between the lines of Telangana liberalisation struggle?. The okward living condition of Telugu speaking people in NIZAM rule. Even the long Cherised Congress politicians ever taken keen interest on Telangana? No never. Telangana people were subjugated before independance by Nizam rulers and by Congress leaders after independence. The question of “Atmagowravam” is the predominent factor rather than development, of course development is also essential factor. If KCR was treated with honour by Chandrababu Naid where is the question of launcing TRS? Leave these selfish things aside. If the rulers of Andhra Pradesh from 1956 onwards had a impartial outlook on Telangana where is the question of Naxalism.
If one may agree or disagree, the fact is that the Telangana people were exploited for the betterment of other regions and there is no need to mention here who are the beneficiaries.
NOW WHO CAN SAY THAT CIRANJEEVI HAD NO CLARITY ABOUT TELANGANA ISSUE WITHOUT HAVING CLARITY IN THEMSELVES
chakrapani garu puttinappude full knowledge tho puttinatlunnaru kadha